Between December 1948 and 1951, witnesses across northern New Mexico reported vivid green fireballs that moved too slow and too level for meteors. Lincoln LaPaz, head of UNM's Institute of Meteoritics, ruled out the natural-meteor explanation after more than a hundred interviews. A 1949 Los Alamos conference settled weakly on "probably of natural origin." Project Twinkle, set up to photograph one, never did. The case is still officially open.

Possibly the result of radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power; recommended a scientific board
Probably of natural origin
Phenomena unexplained; not extraterrestrial bodies
Our read
Evidence — 10 claims
10 supported
Sources — 5
5 sources · reference + court / archive + journalism
Northern New Mexico, December 5, 1948. A green fireball crossed the sky near Holloman Air Force Base — vivid, fast, and wrong. Wrong color for a meteor. Wrong trajectory. Wrong altitude. Pilots, scientists, and military personnel reported it. Then they reported another. Then dozens more.
5 sources grouped by provenance class.
5
cited sources
UAP
On April 25, 2013, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection aircraft filmed a thermal-infrared sequence near Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, of a small object that appeared to fly low and fast, split in two, and dip toward the ocean. The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies called it genuinely anomalous, while skeptics — and a 2025 Pentagon AARO report — argue it shows wind-drifting sky lanterns, with the 'speed' a parallax illusion and the 'water entry' a thermal-imaging artifact.
2013-04-25
UAP
On December 9, 1965, a brilliant fireball crossed the skies over the eastern U.S. and Canada, and witnesses near Kecksburg, Pennsylvania reported an acorn-shaped metallic object in the woods — and a military cordon that hauled something away. The Army said it found nothing. Astronomers point to a meteor; the case, dubbed 'Pennsylvania's Roswell,' remains unresolved.
1965-12-09
UAP
Between November 1989 and April 1990, more than 13,500 people in Belgium reported the same thing — a large, silent, triangular craft moving slowly at low altitude with bright lights at each corner. The Belgian Air Force scrambled F-16s on March 30/31, 1990; one pilot got a brief radar lock. The Belgian Defence Ministry took the reports seriously on the record, and SOBEPS compiled a casebook that remains one of the best-documented mass-sighting archives in the world.
Not natural meteors; probably an unconventional defensive device (U.S. or foreign)
Unidentified
Competing readings of the record remain live.
What remains unexplained
Three years of sightings, a failed photographic program, a dissatisfied scientific panel, and a meteor expert who rejected the meteor explanation. The case is officially unidentified and has not been reopened.
1 record
1 record
2 records
1 record
Key sources
Between December 1948 and 1951, witnesses across northern New Mexico — including staff at Los Alamos, Sandia Base, and White Sands — reported a recurring phenomenon: bright green fireballs moving in flat, level trajectories at speeds inconsistent with conventional meteors. The color was described consistently as a vivid, almost artificial green. Natural meteors are rarely green, rarely level, and rarely slow. These were all three.
The timing was not incidental. Los Alamos was where the bomb was built. Sandia was where it was assembled. White Sands was where it was tested. Whatever was flying over New Mexico was flying over the most sensitive nuclear infrastructure in the world.
1 observation mode on record.
1
modes
Visual observation
Human
Human
1
Lincoln LaPaz, director of the University of New Mexico's Institute of Meteoritics and one of the country's leading experts on exactly this kind of thing, conducted more than a hundred witness interviews. His conclusion: not meteors. The color spectrum was wrong, the trajectory was wrong, and — critically — no meteoritic debris was ever recovered from any of the impact zones LaPaz triangulated from witness accounts. He proposed the fireballs were probably an unconventional device, either American or foreign.
U.S. Army Intelligence took the question seriously enough to float a darker possibility in a Fourth Army memo: radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power. The proximity to nuclear facilities was the explicit concern.
In February 1949, Los Alamos convened a scientific conference. Edward Teller attended. LaPaz attended. The panel's verdict: probably of natural origin. The word "probably" was doing a lot of work. None of the panelists were satisfied the question was actually answered.
The Air Force response was Project Twinkle — a two-year program of cinetheodolite stations positioned near White Sands specifically to photograph the fireballs. Project Twinkle photographed nothing. The fireballs kept being reported. The cameras kept missing them. The program was quietly terminated, its final report later declassified, its conclusion: phenomena unexplained, but not extraterrestrial bodies. The second half of that sentence did more work than the evidence warranted.
The natural-meteor hypothesis has a problem: LaPaz spent his career classifying meteors, and he rejected it explicitly, on technical grounds, after more than a hundred interviews. The foreign-weapons hypothesis has a problem: no foreign power in 1948 had a known capability that fits the description. The secret-American-program hypothesis has a problem: nobody has ever produced the program.
Edward Ruppelt, who ran Project Blue Book in the early 1950s, wrote about the green fireballs in his 1956 memoir — and noted that the people most alarmed by them were the scientists who knew best what they weren't. That's a specific data point. The people with the most relevant expertise were the least satisfied by the conventional explanations.
Project Blue Book inherited the case and never reclassified it. It remains: unidentified.
The green fireballs were reported consistently, by credentialed witnesses, over a three-year period, above the most sensitive military-scientific installations in the United States. The official investigation designed to photograph them failed to do so. The scientific panel convened to explain them declined to do so with confidence. The meteor expert who studied them most closely rejected the meteor explanation entirely.
What they were is still an open question. The record is clear on what they weren't — or at least on what the people most qualified to say so thought they weren't.
Between December 1948 and 1951, witnesses near Los Alamos, Sandia Base, and White Sands reported vivid green fireballs moving in flat, level trajectories at speeds inconsistent with natural meteors. The phenomenon was reported by military personnel, pilots, and scientists — including Lincoln LaPaz, the country's leading meteoritics expert, who concluded they were not meteors after more than a hundred witness interviews. The case remains officially unidentified.
LaPaz, director of the University of New Mexico's Institute of Meteoritics, concluded the fireballs were not natural meteors based on their color spectrum, trajectory, and the absence of any recovered meteoritic debris from the impact zones he triangulated. He proposed they were probably an unconventional device — either American or foreign — though he never endorsed an extraterrestrial explanation. His findings were presented at the 1949 Los Alamos conference but did not produce a consensus.
Project Twinkle was a U.S. Air Force program launched in response to the green fireball reports, positioning cinetheodolite camera stations near White Sands specifically to photograph the phenomenon. Over two years of operation, the program captured no fireballs on film despite continued sightings in the area. It was quietly terminated, and its declassified final report concluded the phenomena were unexplained but not extraterrestrial bodies.
The fireballs were appearing repeatedly over Los Alamos, Sandia Base, and White Sands — the facilities where the United States built, assembled, and tested nuclear weapons. U.S. Army Intelligence raised the possibility in a Fourth Army memo that the phenomenon could represent radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power. That concern, more than the fireballs themselves, drove the urgency of the official response.
Yes. Project Blue Book inherited the case and never reclassified it — it remains officially unidentified. The 1949 Los Alamos scientific panel concluded only "probably of natural origin," a verdict none of the panelists were fully satisfied with, and Project Twinkle's two-year photographic effort produced no evidence. No subsequent official investigation has reopened the case.
1989-11-29
U.S. Army Intelligence (Fourth Army Headquarters)
1949-01-13
Possibly the result of radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power; recommended a scientific board
Memo cited proximity to America's most sensitive nuclear installations as the source of the concern.
Los Alamos Scientific Board
1949-02-16
Probably of natural origin
Convened at Los Alamos. Edward Teller and Lincoln LaPaz attended. The "probably" was the load-bearing word — none of the panelists were satisfied that the question was answered.
Project Twinkle (U.S. Air Force)
1951
Phenomena unexplained; not extraterrestrial bodies
Two years of cinetheodolite-station coverage near White Sands captured no fireballs on film. The program was quietly terminated and its final report later declassified.
Lincoln LaPaz — UNM Institute of Meteoritics
mid-1950s
Not natural meteors; probably an unconventional defensive device (U.S. or foreign)
Based on more than a hundred witness interviews, color-spectrum work, and the absence of meteoritic debris. LaPaz never endorsed an extraterrestrial explanation.
Project Blue Book (U.S. Air Force)
1952
Unidentified
Inherited the case from earlier Air Force projects in 1952. Never reclassified. The case has not been officially reopened.
This account draws on publicly available sources and historical records. Report a factual error → How we source and correct →