The Green Fireballs of New Mexico
Between December 1948 and 1951, witnesses across northern New Mexico reported vivid green fireballs that moved too slow and too level for meteors. Lincoln LaPaz, head of UNM's Institute of Meteoritics, ruled out the natural-meteor explanation after more than a hundred interviews. A 1949 Los Alamos conference settled weakly on "probably of natural origin." Project Twinkle, set up to photograph one, never did. The case is still officially open.

- U.S. Army Intelligence (Fourth Army Headquarters)1949-01-13
Possibly the result of radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power; recommended a scientific board
- Los Alamos Scientific Board1949-02-16
Probably of natural origin
- Project Twinkle (U.S. Air Force)1951
Phenomena unexplained; not extraterrestrial bodies
- Lincoln LaPaz — UNM Institute of Meteoriticsmid-1950s
Not natural meteors; probably an unconventional defensive device (U.S. or foreign)
- Project Blue Book (U.S. Air Force)1952
Unidentified
Northern New Mexico. December 5, 1948. Two plane crews, on separate flights, watched a brilliant green object cross the sky south-to-north, moving — they all said — too slowly to be a meteor, and the wrong color besides. It was the first of thirty within ten weeks, every one clustered over the same patch of desert: Los Alamos, Sandia Base, White Sands.
By February 1949, the government was worried. The Director of Army Intelligence at Fourth Army Headquarters in Texas wrote that the fireballs "[may be] the result of radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power" — and that, occurring as they were in the vicinity of America's most sensitive installations, "a scientific board [should]…study the situation."
The board convened at Los Alamos on February 16, 1949. Edward Teller was in attendance — the future father of the hydrogen bomb. Lincoln LaPaz was at the table. The agenda was, in effect: are these ours, are they someone else's, or are they meteors? The conclusion did not satisfy anyone in the room. The phenomena were, the report said, "probably of natural origin." Probably.
Lincoln LaPaz, in 1949, was the head of the Institute of Meteoritics at the University of New Mexico — the country's leading expert on what falls out of the sky. If anyone could rule on whether the fireballs were meteors, it was him. He carried a color spectrum chart and interviewed more than a hundred witnesses, asking each to point to the exact shade of green they had seen. Time after time, witnesses pointed to the same vivid, particular green — markedly different from the pale, yellowish-green sometimes reported in genuine meteor falls.
LaPaz traced flight paths, scoured the impact zones, and found nothing. No fragments. No crater. No charred mesquite. A meteor that does not deposit a meteorite is not a meteor.
He kept a list of other complications. The fireballs moved too slowly. They moved level. They did not trail sparks or dust. He sent it all to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, on the record, and waited for the explanation that did not come.
In December 1949, the Air Force funded a small program to settle the question: photograph one. Project Twinkle set up three cinetheodolite stations near White Sands — the same instruments used to track V-2 launches — with two cameras and a spectrograph operator at each station, watching every clear night. Twinkle ran for roughly two years. It photographed nothing. Its final report concluded that the phenomena remained unexplained but were not "extraterrestrial bodies" — a kind of small-print honesty the rest of the document doesn't earn.
By the mid-1950s LaPaz had moved off "probably of natural origin." His final view, expressed to the Atomic Energy Commission and, later, to Edward J. Ruppelt — who headed Project Blue Book in its first years — was that the fireballs were probably either an "unconventional defensive device" of our own, secretly fielded, or someone else's. He never claimed to have the answer. He claimed that the answer wasn't natural. The Air Force did not endorse his conclusion. They also did not contradict it. Project Blue Book, which absorbed the case in 1952, left it as "unidentified."
Seventy-seven years. The official record still reads: probably of natural origin, three decimal places of uncertainty. Project Twinkle's photographs do not exist because they were never taken. Lincoln LaPaz died in 1985 with the fireballs unexplained — though "unexplained" was, in his framing, a polite word.
On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of War's second PURSUE tranche included historical material on the green fireballs of 1949. Nothing in it closed the question. The record is still what LaPaz left it: probably-of-natural-origin, with one professional opinion attached saying otherwise.
What this record is built from
5 sources grouped by provenance class.
5
cited sources
- 01
Archive / official record
1 record
primary · 1 - 02
Reporting
1 record
secondary · 1 - 03
Secondary synthesis
2 records
secondary · 2 - 04
Reference
1 record
context · 1
Key sources
- K1court-archive-official / primary The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, Chapter 4 — Edward J. Ruppelt (1956) — Wikisource
- K2secondary-synthesis / secondary Project Twinkle — UFO Casebook
Current editorial status
Competing readings of the record remain live.
Source basis
1
Explanation
Contested
Competing readings of the record remain live.
Attention
High
A strong candidate for social and video packaging.
Residue
The official record says probably natural; the specialist who investigated meteors most directly rejected that closure.
Evidence fingerprint
4 evidence types and 3 sourced claims.
4
types
4
sources
- Secondary summaryE01
- Official documentE02
- News reportE03
- EyewitnessE04
- C1
Repeated New Mexico sightings
Supported2 sources - C2
Natural-meteor explanation
Contested2 sources - C3
Project Twinkle photographic closure
Resolved1 source
How the case was observed
1 observation mode on record.
1
modes
- S01
Visual observation
Human
Human
1
Residue
What remains
The official record says probably natural; the specialist who investigated meteors most directly rejected that closure.
- 01The Los Alamos board landed on probably natural, not a firm identification.
- 02Project Twinkle was designed to photograph the phenomenon and failed to capture it.
- 03LaPaz treated the meteor explanation as inadequate after field interviews and missing debris.
What were the green fireballs?
Brilliantly green, sharply defined objects observed crossing the sky over northern New Mexico from December 1948 through 1951 — densely over Los Alamos, Sandia Base, and White Sands. They moved too slowly and too level for meteors, did not trail sparks or dust, and left no fragments or craters when investigators searched the impact zones.
Did Project Twinkle ever photograph one?
No. Twinkle ran three cinetheodolite stations near White Sands for roughly two years (1949–1951) without capturing a single fireball on film. The program was quietly terminated; its final report concluded the phenomena remained unexplained.
Did Lincoln LaPaz think they were aliens?
No. LaPaz, who interviewed more than a hundred witnesses, ruled out the natural-meteor explanation but never endorsed an extraterrestrial one. By the mid-1950s his working view was that the fireballs were probably an "unconventional defensive device" — either a secret U.S. weapon or a foreign one. The Air Force neither endorsed nor contradicted his view.
Is this case connected to PURSUE Release 02?
Yes. The U.S. Department of War's second PURSUE tranche, published at war.gov/UFO on May 22, 2026, included historical material on the 1949 New Mexico green fireball investigations. Nothing in the release closed the question; the case remains officially "probably of natural origin," with Lincoln LaPaz's dissenting professional opinion still on the record.
UAP
The Aguadilla Incident
On April 25, 2013, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection aircraft filmed a thermal-infrared sequence near Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, of a small object that appeared to fly low and fast, split in two, and dip toward the ocean. The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies called it genuinely anomalous, while skeptics — and a 2025 Pentagon AARO report — argue it shows wind-drifting sky lanterns, with the 'speed' a parallax illusion and the 'water entry' a thermal-imaging artifact.
2013-04-25
UAP
The Kecksburg Incident
On December 9, 1965, a brilliant fireball crossed the skies over the eastern U.S. and Canada, and witnesses near Kecksburg, Pennsylvania reported an acorn-shaped metallic object in the woods — and a military cordon that hauled something away. The Army said it found nothing. Astronomers point to a meteor; the case, dubbed 'Pennsylvania's Roswell,' remains unresolved.
1965-12-09
UAP
The Belgian UFO Wave
Between November 1989 and April 1990, more than 13,500 people in Belgium reported the same thing — a large, silent, triangular craft moving slowly at low altitude with bright lights at each corner. The Belgian Air Force scrambled F-16s on March 30/31, 1990; one pilot got a brief radar lock. The Belgian Defence Ministry took the reports seriously on the record, and SOBEPS compiled a casebook that remains one of the best-documented mass-sighting archives in the world.
1989-11-29
U.S. Army Intelligence (Fourth Army Headquarters)
1949-01-13
Possibly the result of radiological warfare experiments by a foreign power; recommended a scientific board
Memo cited proximity to America's most sensitive nuclear installations as the source of the concern.
Los Alamos Scientific Board
1949-02-16
Probably of natural origin
Convened at Los Alamos. Edward Teller and Lincoln LaPaz attended. The "probably" was the load-bearing word — none of the panelists were satisfied that the question was answered.
Project Twinkle (U.S. Air Force)
1951
Phenomena unexplained; not extraterrestrial bodies
Two years of cinetheodolite-station coverage near White Sands captured no fireballs on film. The program was quietly terminated and its final report later declassified.
Lincoln LaPaz — UNM Institute of Meteoritics
mid-1950s
Not natural meteors; probably an unconventional defensive device (U.S. or foreign)
Based on more than a hundred witness interviews, color-spectrum work, and the absence of meteoritic debris. LaPaz never endorsed an extraterrestrial explanation.
Project Blue Book (U.S. Air Force)
1952
Unidentified
Inherited the case from earlier Air Force projects in 1952. Never reclassified. The case has not been officially reopened.
- Green fireballs — Wikipedia[cc-by-sa]accessed 2026-05-22
- The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, Chapter 4 — Edward J. Ruppelt (1956) — Wikisource[public-domain]accessed 2026-05-22
- When Mysterious Green Fireballs Worried the US Government — History.com[fair-use]accessed 2026-05-22
- Dr. LaPaz And The Mystery Of The Green Fireballs — Liberation Times[fair-use]accessed 2026-05-22
- Project Twinkle — UFO Casebook[fair-use]accessed 2026-05-22
This account draws on publicly available sources and historical records. Report a factual error →