Anomaly DailyAAnomaly Daily
AD-jwst-cycle-5-previewClass IIOpen

JWST Cycle 5: The Next Shot at K2-18b's Alleged Biosignature

JWST Cycle 5 begins observations around July 2026, and among its targets: K2-18b, the sub-Neptune 124 light-years away where a 2023 Cambridge-led team claimed to detect dimethyl sulfide — a molecule produced by marine life on Earth. A 2025 NASA-led reanalysis (Welbanks et al., arXiv:2508.05961) found the evidence does not meet the scientific standard of detection. Cycle 5 data could settle it — or complicate it further. This is the scientific method running in public, in real time.

JWST Cycle 5: The Next Shot at K2-18b's Alleged Biosignature
FRONTIER SCIENCE
DISPUTED
2026-07-01 · L2 Lagrange point, 1.5 million km from Earth

In 2023, a Cambridge-led team announced something that stopped the room: a tentative detection of dimethyl sulfide — a molecule on Earth produced almost exclusively by marine phytoplankton — in the atmosphere of K2-18b, a sub-Neptune 124 light-years away. Two years later, a NASA-led reanalysis said the signal doesn't hold up. Now JWST Cycle 5, beginning around July 2026, is lined up to take another look. This is what science is supposed to do. It's just rarely this public, or this consequential.

What happened

K2-18b sits in the habitable zone of its star and belongs to a class of worlds called Hycean planets — hypothetically ocean-covered, hydrogen-rich, potentially hospitable to life. Madhusudhan et al. (2023) published a JWST transmission spectrum of the planet and found features they interpreted as carbon dioxide, methane, and — tentatively — dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS). The authors were careful. They called it "tentative" and explicitly asked for follow-up. The press was less careful. Headlines ran hot.

The follow-up arrived in 2025. Welbanks et al. (arXiv:2508.05961), a NASA-led team, reanalyzed the same data using updated atmospheric retrieval methods. Their conclusion: the DMS feature is not robustly detected. The signal is consistent with noise and instrument systematics. The data, they found, are equally consistent with a DMS-free atmosphere. The 2023 detection, by their read, does not meet the scientific standard of evidence.

The evidence, such as it is

This isn't a case of one team being sloppy. Transmission spectroscopy — reading a planet's atmosphere by analyzing starlight filtered through it during a transit — is genuinely hard. The signals are small. JWST is the most powerful tool humanity has ever pointed at this problem, and it is still working at the edge of what's physically detectable. The original Madhusudhan team flagged the DMS feature as tentative precisely because they knew this. The Welbanks reanalysis isn't a refutation so much as a more conservative read of ambiguous data — and it explicitly calls for more JWST transit observations before any biosignature claim can be evaluated.

That's where Cycle 5 comes in. JWST Cycle 5 approved programs include K2-18b as a target, with observations expected to begin around July 2026. More transits mean more signal stacked against the noise. The ESA Webb Cycle 5 science overview frames this round of observations as part of a broader push on atmospheric characterization for potentially habitable worlds — K2-18b is among the highest-priority cases.

What the data can and can't tell us

Even a clean DMS detection in Cycle 5 wouldn't confirm life. It would confirm a molecule that, on Earth, is mostly made by marine phytoplankton — but "mostly" isn't "exclusively," and K2-18b is not Earth. Abiotic chemistry on a hydrogen-rich Hycean world could plausibly produce similar molecules. The biosignature case requires ruling out those alternatives, and that work is nowhere near done.

Conversely, a non-detection in Cycle 5 wouldn't rule out life either. It would rule out DMS at detectable concentrations, which is a different thing.

What Cycle 5 can realistically deliver: a much cleaner spectrum, a more definitive answer on whether DMS is present at the level the 2023 paper suggested, and — if the signal is still ambiguous — a better-constrained upper limit that tells future missions what they're working with.

Why this case matters

K2-18b is not confirmed to host life. It may not even have DMS. But it is the clearest example we currently have of the scientific method operating in real time on the most interesting question in astronomy. A claim was made. It was scrutinized. The data were found wanting. More data are being collected. That's the whole process, running in public, on a 124-light-year target, with a space telescope that cost ten billion dollars and took thirty years to build. Whatever Cycle 5 finds — confirmation, contradiction, or a deeper puzzle — it will be the most carefully examined atmospheric spectrum of a potentially habitable world in history.

Frequently asked

  • What is dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and why does it matter for K2-18b?

    Dimethyl sulfide is a molecule produced on Earth almost exclusively by marine phytoplankton, which makes it a candidate biosignature — a chemical sign that life might be present. The Cambridge-led Madhusudhan et al. (2023) team reported a tentative DMS detection in K2-18b's atmosphere using JWST transmission spectroscopy, which would be the first potential biosignature ever found on a planet outside our solar system. The key word is tentative: the authors themselves called for follow-up observations, and a 2025 NASA-led reanalysis found the signal doesn't meet the standard of evidence for a real detection.

  • What did the Welbanks et al. 2025 reanalysis actually find?

    The NASA-led Welbanks et al. team (arXiv:2508.05961) reanalyzed the same JWST data using updated atmospheric retrieval methods and concluded that the DMS feature reported in 2023 is consistent with noise and instrument systematics — not a robust detection. They found the data are equally compatible with a DMS-free atmosphere, meaning the original signal doesn't clear the bar for a scientific detection. Crucially, they didn't close the door on K2-18b; they explicitly called for additional JWST transit observations to get a definitive answer.

  • What will JWST Cycle 5 observations of K2-18b actually tell us?

    Cycle 5 observations, expected to begin around July 2026, will stack additional transit data on top of what already exists, improving the signal-to-noise ratio and producing a cleaner atmospheric spectrum. At best, this could confirm or definitively rule out DMS at the concentrations the 2023 paper suggested. Even a clean DMS detection wouldn't confirm life — it would confirm a molecule that life produces on Earth, which is a meaningful but not conclusive data point.

  • Is K2-18b actually a habitable planet?

    K2-18b is a sub-Neptune in the habitable zone of its star, 124 light-years away, and belongs to a hypothetical class of worlds called Hycean planets — potentially ocean-covered with hydrogen-rich atmospheres. Whether it's actually habitable is unknown; the Hycean classification is a model, not an established fact. What JWST is doing is collecting the atmospheric data needed to test whether that model holds, which is a very different thing from confirming the planet supports life.

  • Why did the 2023 DMS announcement get so much attention if the detection was only tentative?

    The Madhusudhan et al. (2023) team was careful — they used the word "tentative" and explicitly asked for follow-up — but the underlying claim (a potential biosignature on a potentially habitable exoplanet) was genuinely extraordinary, and science media coverage often dropped the caveats. DMS is produced almost exclusively by marine life on Earth, so even a tentative signal on a habitable-zone world was always going to generate headlines. The 2025 Welbanks reanalysis is a reminder that "tentative" was doing a lot of work in that original paper.

  • When will we know if K2-18b has biosignatures?

    JWST Cycle 5 observations are expected to begin around July 2026, but data analysis, peer review, and publication take additional time — a definitive result is unlikely before late 2026 at the earliest, and possibly later. Even then, "definitive" means a cleaner answer on DMS specifically, not a final verdict on life; ruling out or confirming one biosignature candidate is one step in a much longer process. The honest answer is that we're probably years away from a claim that would hold up to the scrutiny the 2023 announcement didn't quite survive.

Adjacent specimens

Classifications

  • Madhusudhan et al. 2023 (Cambridge, ApJL)

    2023-09

    Claimed tentative detection of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) in K2-18b atmosphere — interpreted as potential biosignature

    First published in ApJL (2023). Authors described the DMS feature as 'tentative' and called for follow-up observations. DMS is produced almost exclusively by marine phytoplankton on Earth, making it a candidate biosignature for Hycean worlds.

  • Welbanks et al. 2025 (NASA-led, arXiv:2508.05961)

    2025

    Original DMS detection does not meet the standards of evidence — signal is consistent with noise and instrument systematics

    Independent reanalysis using updated atmospheric retrieval methods. Authors find the DMS feature is not robustly detected and that the data are consistent with a DMS-free atmosphere. Calls for additional JWST transit observations before any biosignature claim can be evaluated.

Sources

This account draws on publicly available sources and historical records. Report a factual error →

Get the launch dispatchSubscribe →