Anomaly Daily
AD-amityville-horror-1974Class IIOpen

The Amityville Horror

On November 13, 1974, Ronald DeFeo Jr. murdered six members of his family at 112 Ocean Avenue, Amityville — a real and tragic crime for which he was convicted. The 'haunting' came later: the Lutz family fled after 28 days in 1975-76, and Jay Anson's 1977 bestseller made the house infamous. But DeFeo's own attorney admitted the story was 'created over many bottles of wine,' and investigators found the paranormal claims unsupported.

The Dutch Colonial house at 112 Ocean Avenue in Amityville, New York, photographed under snow in 2010.
PARANORMAL
EXPLAINED
Anomaly DailyA40.67° N · 73.41° W
Doug Kerr / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)
1974-11-13 · 112 Ocean Avenue, Amityville, New York

Our read

SettledFabricated / hoaxOpen

Evidence — 12 claims

7 supported · 4 resolved · 1 contested

supportedresolvedcontested

Sources — 4

4 sources · reference + secondary + journalism

Specimen

Fabricated or hoax

The record points to deliberate fabrication or staged evidence.

evidence
  • ResolvedRonald DeFeo Jr. murdered six members of his family at 112 Ocean Avenue on November 13, 1974.
  • ResolvedDeFeo was convicted on six counts of second-degree murder and sentenced to six consecutive 25-years-to-life terms.
  • ResolvedRonald DeFeo Jr. died in prison in March 2021.
  • SupportedThe Lutz family moved in December 1975 and left after 28 days, claiming paranormal activity.
  • SupportedJay Anson published a bestselling book based on the Lutz account in 1977.
  • SupportedInvestigators found 'cloven hoofprints in the snow' were impossible because no snow fell on the date given.
  • SupportedDeFeo's defense attorney William Weber said he and the Lutzes created the haunting story 'over many bottles of wine.'
  • ResolvedThe 1979 civil suit brought by the Lutzes was dismissed and the account was effectively conceded as fiction.
  • SupportedLater owners of the house reported nothing paranormal and sued over sightseer harassment.
  • SupportedFather Pecararo's account was embellished without his consent, and he reported no firsthand supernatural experience.
  • ContestedGeorge Lutz maintained until his death in 2006 that something genuinely strange occurred, despite embellishments.
  • SupportedDeFeo offered multiple contradictory accounts of the night of the murders over the decades.

What remains unexplained

The haunting is almost certainly fabricated. The murders underneath it are real and documented. What remains open is the full picture of November 13, 1974 — DeFeo's shifting accounts and the question of whether he acted alone.

  • 01DeFeo gave multiple contradictory accounts of the murders over decades; the full picture of that night remains contested.
  • 02George Lutz never fully recanted, maintaining a distinction between his experience and Anson's embellishments — impossible to evaluate from outside.
  • 03Why six people were shot in separate rooms with a high-powered rifle and none apparently woke remains an open forensic question.

112 Ocean Avenue, Amityville, New York. November 13, 1974. Six members of the DeFeo family were shot dead in their beds while they slept. Ronald DeFeo Jr., the eldest son, was convicted on six counts of second-degree murder and sentenced to six consecutive 25-years-to-life terms. He died in prison in March 2021. The murders are documented historical fact. What came next is a different kind of story entirely.

What happened

In December 1975, George and Kathy Lutz moved into the house with their three children. They paid a discounted price — the DeFeo murders were recent and the neighborhood knew it. Twenty-eight days later, they left, claiming the house had driven them out through a sustained campaign of paranormal activity: green slime, demonic pig-faces at windows, cloven hoofprints in snow, a priest repelled by flies in January, doors wrenched off hinges, and a levitating Kathy Lutz.

Jay Anson turned their account into a 1977 bestseller. A film followed in 1979. The house became one of the most recognizable addresses in American paranormal mythology.

The evidence

The evidence against the haunting runs in several directions at once.

First, the physical claims don't hold. Investigators Rick Moran and Peter Jordan found that the 'cloven hoofprints in the snow' were impossible: no snow fell on the date given. The priest who claimed to have heard a voice ordering him to leave — Father Ralph Pecararo — later said he had no firsthand experience of the supernatural in the house and that his account had been embellished without his consent.

Second, the origin story collapsed in court. DeFeo's defense attorney, William Weber, stated plainly that he and the Lutzes created the haunting story together — quote — 'over many bottles of wine.' Weber had a motive: he was attempting to build a new insanity defense for DeFeo, and a haunted house fit the narrative. The Lutzes later sued Weber. The litigation went nowhere useful for either party.

Third, the house's subsequent occupants reported nothing. Later owners — who sued over the harassment they received from sightseers drawn by the book and film — described a normal house on a normal street. No slime. No pig-faces. No levitation. Investigators found the physical and documentary claims unsupported across the board.

The 1979 civil suit brought by the Lutzes was dismissed. The account was effectively conceded as fiction during the proceedings.

What the explanations don't explain

Here's where it gets slightly more interesting than a clean debunk.

The Lutzes never fully recanted. George Lutz maintained until his death in 2006 that something genuinely strange happened in that house, even if the specific details in Anson's book were exaggerated or invented for dramatic effect. He drew a distinction between the experience and the commercialization of it — a distinction that's hard to evaluate from the outside but worth noting.

The DeFeo murders themselves remain genuinely strange. Six people were shot in their sleep, in separate rooms, with a high-powered rifle, and apparently none of them woke up. Theories about sedation, about DeFeo's state of mind, about whether he acted alone — these were contested at trial and remain discussed by researchers. DeFeo offered multiple, contradictory accounts of the night over the decades. The conviction stands. The full picture of what happened inside that house on November 13, 1974 is less settled than the verdict suggests.

The paranormal claims: almost certainly fabricated, or at minimum heavily embellished. The crime underneath them: real, documented, and still not entirely explained.

Frequently asked

  • Were the Amityville haunting claims ever proven true?

    No. Investigators found the physical claims unsupported — including 'cloven hoofprints in snow' on a date when no snow fell — and DeFeo's own defense attorney admitted he and the Lutzes created the haunting story together. The 1979 civil suit brought by the Lutzes was dismissed, and later owners of the house reported nothing paranormal.

  • What actually happened at 112 Ocean Avenue in 1974?

    On November 13, 1974, Ronald DeFeo Jr. shot and killed six members of his family while they slept. He was convicted on six counts of second-degree murder and sentenced to six consecutive 25-years-to-life terms. DeFeo died in prison in March 2021.

  • Why did the Lutzes say the house was haunted?

    The Lutzes claimed 28 days of paranormal activity after moving in December 1975, and their account became the basis for Jay Anson's 1977 bestseller. DeFeo's defense attorney William Weber later said he helped construct the story with the Lutzes — his goal was to build a new insanity defense for DeFeo. George Lutz maintained until his death that something real had occurred, even if the published details were exaggerated.

  • Did the Amityville Horror story hold up in court?

    No. The 1979 civil litigation was dismissed, and the haunting account was effectively conceded as fiction during the proceedings. DeFeo's attorney William Weber publicly stated that he and the Lutzes 'created this horror story over many bottles of wine.'

  • What happened to later residents of the Amityville house?

    Subsequent owners reported no paranormal activity and sued over the harassment they received from sightseers drawn by the book and film. The house has changed hands multiple times and the address has since been changed to deter tourism.

Adjacent specimens

Classifications

  • New York State courts (Suffolk County)

    1975-11

    Ronald DeFeo Jr. convicted on six counts of second-degree murder

    The insanity defense was rejected; he was sentenced to six consecutive 25-years-to-life terms. The murders are documented historical fact; DeFeo died in prison in March 2021.

  • Skeptical and investigative consensus (Joe Nickell; researchers Rick Moran and Peter Jordan)

    2003

    The haunting claims are debunked as a hoax or fabrication

    Investigations found the physical and documentary claims unsupported — for example, the 'cloven hoofprints in the snow' were impossible because no snow fell on the date given.

  • U.S. civil courts (1979 litigation)

    1979-09

    The Lutz suit was dismissed; the account was effectively conceded as fiction during proceedings

    DeFeo's defense attorney William Weber said he and the Lutzes 'created this horror story over many bottles of wine.' Later owners reported nothing paranormal and sued over harassment by sightseers.

Sources

This account draws on publicly available sources and historical records. Report a factual error → How we source and correct →

Further reading

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Other affiliate links may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Get the launch dispatchSubscribe →